PJM Opens a 10-Project Fast Lane Inside a 220GW Queue

What FERC Actually Approved, and When

On June 9, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved PJM Interconnection's proposal for an Expedited Interconnection Track, a standalone process layered on top of PJM's existing interconnection queue rather than a replacement for it. The rule took effect on July 31, 2026, when PJM began accepting applications, and FERC built in a hard stop: the EIT sunsets at the end of 2027, making it explicitly a temporary bridge rather than a permanent second queue.

FERC's own framing was narrow and specific. The commission said the EIT would 'help address PJM's near-term resource adequacy needs by establishing a separate, time-limited, expedited interconnection process for a limited number of resources that are able to bring significant capacity onto the system in the near-term' - language that ties the entire program to PJM's current capacity shortfall rather than to any broader queue-reform ambition.

The Real Gate Is a Governor's Office, Not a Technical Readiness Score

Eligibility for the EIT requires three things: a new or uprated capacity resource of at least 250 megawatts of unforced capacity, the ability to reach commercial operation within three years, and - the criterion that distinguishes this track from ordinary interconnection review - a formal commitment from the state's primary siting authority to expedite the project's development. FERC Commissioner David Rosner made the political dimension explicit in the order, noting that 'states' siting authority over generation and transmission makes public utility commissioners, governors' offices, and state legislatures necessary partners' in the process.

That single requirement means a project's technical merit or grid value is not, on its own, sufficient to qualify. A developer needs an active, working relationship with a state governor's office or public utility commission willing to formally back expedited treatment - a capability that has historically sat with government-affairs teams, not interconnection engineers, and that now sits directly on the critical path to a faster PJM interconnection agreement.

Ten Slots a Year Against a 220 Gigawatt Backlog

PJM's regular interconnection queue currently holds roughly 220 gigawatts of generation applications, alongside a separate Reliability Resource Initiative that has already attracted about 8,000 megawatts of committed capacity. Against that backdrop, the EIT's cap of 10 interconnection requests per year, processed on a rolling basis until the annual limit is reached, is a narrow gate by design - PJM's own target is roughly 10 months from an accepted EIT filing to an executed generation interconnection agreement, versus one to two years for the standard queue, which PJM says will continue to operate on its normal timeline for everyone not selected.

According to analysis from ClearView Energy Partners, PJM could name the first batch of up to 10 selected EIT projects around October 2026, roughly two months ahead of PJM's capacity auction for the 2029/30 delivery year. That timing means the fast-tracked cohort's capacity commitments will be visible to the market, and factored into supply expectations, before that auction clears - giving early EIT entrants a market-timing advantage that later cohorts, constrained by the program's 2027 sunset, may not get the chance to replicate.

What an Owner With a Stalled PJM Application Should Do Now

For any owner or developer with a project sitting in PJM's regular queue that meets the 250-megawatt and three-year-to-service thresholds, the immediate action is not an engineering review - it is a conversation with the relevant state's siting authority about whether that state is willing to issue the formal expedite commitment the EIT requires, since PJM is accepting applications on a rolling basis now and the annual cap of 10 makes early filing materially more valuable than a technically stronger but later one.

For EU and UK observers, the structural lesson travels beyond PJM: when a grid operator builds a formal fast lane gated on state or national government backing rather than purely on technical criteria, capacity planning becomes inseparable from public-affairs strategy, and any owner treating interconnection as a purely engineering process risks losing a scarce fast-track slot to a competitor who treated it as a governance relationship instead.

Read next: 555 Was the Real Price. The Cap Said 325.  |  FERC Just Put the Rules for Connecting Big Loads on a 60-Day Clock