A CEO Says Profitable, The Balance Sheet Says Loss
Wade Rosen took over Atari in 2021, when the company was better known for licensing its own name than for shipping games. On 3 August 2026 he told investors that Atari's core business, games and hardware, had reached operational profitability for the first time in several years. Revenue for that core business grew 31 percent to 44.2 million euro, games revenue alone rose 67.7 percent to 46.1 million euro on a consolidated basis, and hardware revenue jumped 83 percent to 7.3 million euro. Operating income for Atari's own business came in at 0.9 million euro, against a 0.8 million euro loss the year before.
That is a real turnaround, and Rosen is right to say so. It is also not the number that shows up at the bottom of Atari's fiscal year 2025-26 results.
The 97 Percent Decision
Consolidated group revenue reached 56.0 million euro, up 66 percent year on year and the highest level Atari has posted in more than a decade. Below that line, the group reported a consolidated operating loss of 6.7 million euro and a net loss of 4.8 million euro. The gap between Rosen's profitable core business and the group's loss is one company: Thunderful Group, the Swedish publisher and developer whose catalogue Atari brought further under its roof by raising its ownership stake to 97 percent during the year. Thunderful alone posted a 7.6 million euro operating loss, more than enough to turn Atari's first profitable year in a decade into a group-wide net loss on paper.
Atari did not stumble into this. Building a 97 percent stake in Thunderful was a deliberate capital allocation choice, made the same year as two smaller, cleaner acquisitions: the 29.3 million dollar purchase of Hipster Whale, maker of Crossy Road, and the rights to five Ubisoft-owned titles including Child of Eden and Grow Home. Those two deals show Atari's underlying strategy is sound: buy proven, cash-generating games IP outright. Thunderful was a different kind of bet, a majority stake in another company's entire operating structure, including whatever losses that structure was already carrying.
Why Majority Ownership Changes What A Loss Means
Why it matters: a minority stake in a struggling partner shows up as a line item you can eventually walk away from. A 97 percent stake makes that partner's income statement your income statement, consolidated in full, every quarter, whether or not you control the day-to-day decisions that caused the loss. Atari now carries essentially all of Thunderful's downside with none of the option to simply leave it off the group's own results.
Yes, but: staying a minority investor would have left Atari with less say over a publisher whose catalogue it may want folded into its own IP strategy over time. Full ownership was not automatically the wrong call. It was a bet that Thunderful's operating loss would shrink faster than Atari's own business grew, and that bet has not paid off yet.
The bottom line: fiscal year 2025-26 is really two stories stacked on top of each other, a genuine operational recovery at Atari and an unresolved integration cost at Thunderful, and only one of those two stories was inside management's control on a quarterly basis.
The Instruction For Anyone Weighing A Majority Stake
If you are weighing raising your stake in a struggling partner or supplier past the 50 percent consolidation threshold, run the arithmetic before the deal closes, not after the next results call. Model the partner's worst realistic operating loss against your own best-case operating income for the same period, then ask whether your own numbers can absorb that loss and still read as progress to your board, your lenders, or your own conscience. Atari's core business had its best year in a decade. Because of an ownership decision made the year before, almost nobody outside the earnings call will remember that; they will remember the net loss.
Read next: Every Publisher Gets a Veto on Your Old Games | EA Stops Reporting Its Numbers After Today



